(UD)(PS)Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Sherzad et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, NA |
| Atall Sherzad and Mizhgan Alam |
| 2:2022cv00552 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/28/22, REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Mizhgan Alam, Atall Sherzad. (Certified copy sent to Superior Court) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin Superior Court of CA, Manteca Branch, Case number MAN-CV-LUDRF-2019-011744 filed by Mizhgan Alam, Atall Sherzad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L) |
| RECEIPT number #CAE200120043 $402.00 Filing Fee fbo Atall Sherzad by Atall Sherzad on 3/28/2022. (Reader, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: [HAND DELIVERED] #2 Civil New Case Documents for TLN served on Mizhgan Alam, Atall Sherzad. (Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
