Bala v Blinken , et al
| Anju Bala |
| Antony J. Blinken and David J. Ranz |
| 2:2022cv00631 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Anju Bala. Antony J. Blinken served on 4/14/2022; David J. Ranz served on 4/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Attorney General, #2 Proof of Service on Defendant Anthony J. Blinken, #3 Proof of Service on Defendant David J. Ranz)(Sturman, David) Modified on 5/13/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added Attorney Elliot C. Wong for Antony J. Blinken and David J. Ranz. (Wong, Elliot) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Antony J. Blinken, David J. Ranz* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *David Michael Sturman* *David M. Sturman, APC* *16530 Ventura Blvd., Suite 412* *Encino, CA 91436*. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony J. Blinken and David J. Ranz by Anju Bala . Attorney Sturman, David Michael added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10166430) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sturman, David). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
