(PC) Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff et al
| Stanley W. Mundy |
| Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff, California Department of Corrections, Scott Jones, Karla Gomez Pimental, Alma Vieyra, S. Lucero, O. Onyeje and Marilyn Conanan |
| 2:2022cv00668 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Deborah Barnes |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
OBJECTIONS to #5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Stanley W. Mundy. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/9/2022 DENYING #7 Motion for Extension of Time. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and #10 Order served on Stanley W. Mundy. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of filing by Stanley W. Mundy re #6 Consent/Decline of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #7 Motion for Extension of time. (Mena-Sanchez, L)(Response sent: "This case was originally filed in Fresno under case number 1:22-cv-409. It was transferred to the Sacramento division on April 15, 2022 and assigned a new case number which is 2:22-cv-0668 WBS DB P.") Modified on 5/4/2022 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 8
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by Stanley W. Mundy in SUPPORT of #7 Motion for Extension of Time. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME, MOTION for Relief to get legal property and NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS to MCSP P.O. Box 409060 Ione, CA 95640 by Stanley W. Mundy. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/02/22 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a District Judge. Senior Judge William B. Shubb added to the case. It is further RECOMMENDED #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied as moot and the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 20 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:22-cv-0668 WBS DB (PC)(Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Stanley W. Mundy. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 04/14/2022.(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Stanley W. Mundy. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Stanley W. Mundy. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Stanley W. Mundy. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against California Department of Corrections, Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff by Stanley W. Mundy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
