Chinna v. Jordan et al
Plaintiff: Harminder Singh Chinna
Defendant: Mari Carmen Jordan, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Case Number: 2:2022cv00671
Filed: April 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/26/2022: Pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal (ECF No. #6 ) and FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is hereby DISMISSED. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M)
May 26, 2022 Filing 6 STIPULATION of DISMISSAL by Merrick B. Garland, Mari Carmen Jordan, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Wong, Elliot)
April 26, 2022 Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elliot C. Wong for Merrick B. Garland,Elliot C. Wong for Mari Carmen Jordan,Elliot C. Wong for Alejandro Mayorkas (Wong, Elliot)
April 18, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Siguenza, Joseph)
April 18, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A)
April 18, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Merrick B. Garland, Mari Carmen Jordan, Alejandro Mayorkas* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Joseph John Siguenza* *L/O Ashwani Bhakhri* *1299 Bayshore Hwy, Suite 208* *Burlingame, CA 94010*. (Kastilahn, A)
April 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Harminder Singh Chinna. Attorney Siguenza, Joseph John added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10180784) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siguenza, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chinna v. Jordan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harminder Singh Chinna
Represented By: Joseph John Siguenza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mari Carmen Jordan
Represented By: Elliot C. Wong, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Elliot C. Wong, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: Elliot C. Wong, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?