Chavez et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corp.
| Stacy Chavez and Amanda Chavez |
| Freedom Mortgage Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00699 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for to Extend Deadline for Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation to Respond to Complaint by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sharma, Dhruv) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Sharma, Dhruv) Modified on 5/20/2022 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/25/2022 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2022-00316713 by Defendant. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10192225) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #6 Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit A, #8 Exhibit B)(Sharma, Dhruv). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
