(PC) Elia v. Martin et al
| Christopher R Elia and Christopher R. Elia |
| Jeremy Martin, Adam Stone, C Stewart, D La Barberra, Dimitri Kaulakov, Monivirin Son, Amador County Sheriff's Department, County of Amador, C. Stewart and D. La Barberra |
| 2:2022cv00702 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Prison Account of Christopher R. Elia signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/21/2022. The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/21/2022 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request to proceed ifp. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. Plaintiff's complaint alleges, for screening purposes, potentially cognizable deliberate indifference to safety claims against defendants Koulakov, Martin and Stone. All other claims and defendants are DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff is not obligated to amend his complaint. Within 30 days plaintiff shall return the attached notice advising the court how he elects to proceed. Failure to comply with any part of this this order may result in dismissal of this action. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, #5 Screening Order served on Christopher R. Elia. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Christopher R. Elia (Kaminski, H)
|
|
CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Christopher R. Elia, CDCR# BP-8147 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Christopher R. Elia. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher R Elia. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Amador County Sheriff's Department, County of Amador, Dimitri Kaulakov, D La Barberra, Jeremy Martin, Monivirin Son, C Stewart, Adam Stone by Christopher R Elia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Licea Chavez, V)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
