Pacek v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co., et al
Jaroslaw Pacek |
Travelers Commercial Insurance Company and Standard Fire Insurance Company |
2:2022cv00714 |
April 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Morrison C England |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by Standard Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company. Attorney DeLaney, Kathleen M. added. (DeLaney, Kathleen) |
![]() |
Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Jaroslaw Pacek for attorney Robert T. Trautmann to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10198844) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Appel, Marie) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *The Standard Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Marie Noel Appel* *Morgan & Morgan* *700 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 511* *San Francisco, CA 94102*. (Huang, H) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jaroslaw Pacek. Attorney Appel, Marie Noel added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10197137) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Appel, Marie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.