(SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Nicol M. Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2022cv00818
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-00818-TLN DMC. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rizzo, Barbara)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 8/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]. (Rodriguez, E)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *90* days. Attorney *Barbara M. Rizzo* *Law Office of Barbara M. Rizzo* *PO Box 383103* *Waikoloa, HI 96738*. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]. (Rodriguez, E)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 05/23/2022 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING E-Service on the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk shall issue a summons and serve this order, summons and complaint on the Commissioner of Social Security. [Served by Clerk on Commissioner via E-Service Agreement]. (Rodriguez, E)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET by Nicol M. Johnson.(Rizzo, Barbara) Modified on 5/18/2022 (Huang, H).
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Benson, A.)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Nicol M Johnson. (Rizzo, Barbara)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Nicol M. Johnson. Attorney Rizzo, Barbara M. added. (Rizzo, Barbara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicol M. Johnson
Represented By: Barbara M. Rizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Admin- SS E-Service
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?