(PC) Howell v. Moktar et al
Kareem Jabbar Howell and Kareem J. Howell |
J. Moktar, F. Troja, J Johnson, K. Childs, S. Williamson and Flood |
2:2022cv00842 |
May 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, and prisoner IFP form served on Kareem J. Howell. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *5/18/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 6/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Perdue, C.) |
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Kareem Jabbar Howell. (Perdue, C.) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against K. Childs, Flood, J. Johnson, J. Moktar, F. Troja, and S. Williamson by Kareem Jabbar Howell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perdue, C.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.