Smith v. Amazon.com Services LLC
| Maureen Smith |
| Amazon.com Services LLC Doing business as Amazon |
| 2:2022cv00874 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/6/2022 REMANDING CASE to San Joaquin County Superior Court. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Remand by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Andrade, Chandra) Modified on 6/30/2022 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to REMAND Case to State Court by Maureen Smith. Motion Hearing set for 9/13/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Clay, Jerome) Modified on 6/23/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-0874-JAM-AC. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Andrade, Chandra) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Andrade, Chandra) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin County Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UWT-2022-0002760 by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E. #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Andrade, Chandra) |
| PAYMENT for Civil Case filing fee in the amount of $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10243710. (Andrade, Chandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Amazon.com Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maureen Smith | |
| Represented By: | Jerome Anthony Clay, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC Doing business as Amazon | |
| Represented By: | Chandra S. Andrade |
| Represented By: | Daniela Andrea Archila |
| Represented By: | Douglas E. Dexter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
