Harger v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
| Elizabeth Ann Harger |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company |
| 2:2022cv00895 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/16/2022: Pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal (ECF No. #8 ) and FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION For Dismissal with Prejudice by Elizabeth Ann Harger. (Ruggles, Matthew) |
Filing 7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 07/01/2022 ORDERING The claims in this Action shall be SUBMITTED to arbitration pursuant to the parties' Agreement. This Action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to confirm, vacate, or otherwise review any arbitral award under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 1 et. seq.. All upcoming deadlines, including those set in the Court's 05/26/2022 Initial Scheduling Order, are off calendar. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Submission to Arbitration by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. (Fellion, Andrea) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by Not More than 28 Days [L.R. 144(A) by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Attorney Fellion, Andrea L. added. (Fellion, Andrea) Modified on 6/14/2022 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company served on 5/27/2022, answer due 6/17/2022. (Ruggles, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bristol-Myers Squibb Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew Jeremy Ruggles* *Ruggles Law Firm* *7940 California Avenue, 1st Floor* *Fair Oaks, CA 95628*. (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bristol-Myers Squibb Company by Elizabeth Ann Harger. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10249617) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ruggles, Matthew). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harger v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ann Harger | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Jeremy Ruggles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | |
| Represented By: | Andrea L. Fellion |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
