(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento et al
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Rojas
Defendant: County of Sacramento and Anthony Bell
Case Number: 2:2022cv00962
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 EXHIBITS by Robert Eugene Rojas in support of claim and showing the exhaustion of administrative remedies. (MAINTAIN ON PAPER) (Kastilahn, A)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robert Eugene Rojas. (Perdue, C.)
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robert Eugene Rojas. (Licea Chavez, V)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/6/22 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Kaminski, H)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order, Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, served on Robert Eugene Rojas. (Kaminski, H)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 7/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Maldonado, C)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 06/02/2022. CASE TRANSFERRRED to Sacramento Division. New Case Number 2:22-cv-00962-DMC. Old Case Number 1:22-cv-00650-GSA. (Maldonado, C)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order, served on Robert Eugene Rojas. (Maldonado, C)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robert Eugene Rojas. (Sant Agata, S)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Robert Eugene Rojas.(Sant Agata, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?