(PC)Elliott v. Ehlers et al
| Christopher Elliott |
| R. Ehlers, S. Leatherman, A. Sheaer and K. McKenna |
| 2:2022cv01040 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re #7 Order against R. Ehlers, S. Leatherman, K. McKenna, A. Sheaer by Christopher Elliott.(Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 9
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #8 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Prison Account of Christopher Elliott signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/20/2022.The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/20/2022 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request to proceed ifp and DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall complete and return the attached Notice with the required documents. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, #7 Order Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend served on Christopher Elliott. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Christopher Elliott (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Christopher Elliott, CDC AA-3733 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *6/15/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 7/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Reader, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Christopher Elliott. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher Elliott. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against R. Ehlers, S. Leatherman, K. McKenna, A. Sheaer by Christopher Elliott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
