Ramirez v. Estes Express Lines
| Hector Ramirez |
| Estes Express Lines |
| 2:2022cv01047 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Streza, David) |
| Filing 10 REPLY by Hector Ramirez to RESPONSE to #5 Motion to Remand,. (Demas, John) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Demas, John) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy N. Cannarozzi: The parties are directed to complete and file the Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment form #3 within seven days of the date of this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/2/2022. (Text Only Entry)(Cannarozzi, N)
|
| Filing 7 OPPOSITION by Estes Express Lines to #5 Motion to Remand. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Janice Beacham, #2 Declaration of David J. Streza, #3 Certificate of Service)(Streza, David) Modified on 8/2/2022 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 6 PROOF of SERVICE re #5 Motion to Remand. (Demas, John) Modified on 7/19/2022 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for leave to AMEND and to REMAND by Hector Ramirez. Motion Hearing set for 9/1/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Demas, John) Modified on 7/19/2022 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Hector Ramirez. Attorney Demas, John N added. (Demas, John) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Estes Express Lines. (Streza, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Yolo County Superior Court, case number 2022CV-0609 by Estes Express Lines. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10285332) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Streza, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Estes Express Lines | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hector Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Bradley A. Schultz |
| Represented By: | John N Demas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Estes Express Lines | |
| Represented By: | David Streza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
