(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
Plaintiff: Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant: M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce, B. Kelly, S. Sergent, S. Hurtado, C. Mott, D. Clay, J. Quiring and H. Moseley
Case Number: 2:2022cv01156
Filed: June 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis served on Director of CDCR. (Attachments: #1 #6 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (Huang, H)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Dwayne Steven Montgomery signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/25/2022. CDCR is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the Clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Huang, H)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/25/2022 GRANTING #2 , #6 Motions to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All claims and defendants but for the potentially colorable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Culum, Gamaz and Clay are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within 30 days of service of this order, plaintiff may amend his complaint to attempt to state cognizable claims against these defendants. The allegations in the pleading are sufficient to state a potentially cognizable claim against defendants Culum, Gamaz and Clay. If plaintiff opts to proceed on his original complaint as to these defendants, he shall return the attached notice within 30 days of service of this order. If plaintiff opts to proceed on the original complaint, within 30 days of the date of this order he shall file further briefing addressing the relationship between his potentially colorable excessive force claims and his pending criminal charges. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Huang, H)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order and #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Huang, H)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Licea Chavez, V)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Dwayne Steven Montgomery (Licea Chavez, V)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Dwayne Steven Montgomery, CDC K-14298, to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Huang, H)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Gonzalez, R)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/5/22. New Case Number 2:22-cv-1156-KJN. Old Case Number 1:22-cv-0802-BAM. (Gonzalez, R)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Gonzalez, R)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Marrujo, C)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against D. Clay, M. Culum, J. Gamez, S. Hurtado, B. Kelly, H. Moseley, C. Mott, M. Pesce, J. Quiring, S. Sergent by Dwayne Steven Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marrujo, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Culum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Gamez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Pesce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Sergent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Hurtado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Mott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Quiring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H. Moseley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?