Cardenas v. F.D. Thomas, Inc. et al
| Francisco Miguel Pena Cardenas |
| F.D. Thomas, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv01426 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| William B Shubb |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by F.D. Thomas, Inc.. (Sprinkle, Kent) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by F.D. Thomas, Inc. re #3 Civil New Case Documents for Magistrate as Presider, #4 Consent/Decline of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #6 Civil New Case Documents for WBS. (Ho, Desiree) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by F.D. Thomas, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (Ho, Desiree) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/5/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-1426-WBS-KJN. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sprinkle, Kent) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant F.D. Thomas, Inc.. (Ho, Desiree) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2022-00322853-CU-OE-GDS by F.D. Thomas, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10375231) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Kent J. Sprinkle, #3 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #4 Exhibit B - Answer, #5 Exhibit C - Other Docs, #6 Declaration of Trina Gibson, #7 Appendix Exhibit A - Agreement, #8 Appendix Exhibit B - Agreement)(Ho, Desiree) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cardenas v. F.D. Thomas, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Francisco Miguel Pena Cardenas | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Melmed |
| Represented By: | Meghan N. Higday |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: F.D. Thomas, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Desiree Jean Trung Ho |
| Represented By: | Kent Joseph Sprinkle |
| Represented By: | Candace R. Desbaillets |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
