Modesto et al v. Fairshare Solutions, LLC
| Cecilia Ann Modesto and Joe Modesto |
| Fairshare Solutions, LLC |
| 2:2022cv01430 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| John A Mendez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Veggian, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Fairshare Solutions, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael Frederick Cardoza* *The Cardoza Law Corporation* *548 Market Street, #80594* *San Francisco, CA 94104*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fairshare Solutions, LLC by Cecilia Ann Modesto, Joe Modesto. Attorney Cardoza, Michael Frederick added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10378399) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cardoza, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
