Edge-Works Manufacturing Company v. Concealed Carrier, LLC
| Edge-Works Manufacturing Company |
| Concealed Carrier, LLC Doing business as Tacticon |
| 2:2022cv01432 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/6/2022: Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. #24 ) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. The hearing on plaintiff's request to seal and motion for temporary restraining order set for 10/14/2022, is hereby VACATED. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (York, M) |
| Filing 24 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company. (Wolf, Adam) Modified on 10/6/2022 (Zignago, K.). |
| Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER issued by Law Clerk for Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/23/2022: The parties' re #22 Stipulation is GRANTED. The October 7, 2022 hearing of plaintiff's request to seal and motion for temporary restraining order is CONTINUED to October 14, 2022. An opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed on or before September 30, 2022. Any reply may be filed on or before October 7, 2022. (Text Only Entry)(Van Dine, B) |
| Filing 22 SECOND STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Continuance of Hearings & Related Deadlines on RTS & TRO by Concealed Carrier, LLC. (Shofner, Robin) Modified on 9/26/2022 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 21 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME seven (7) days to 9/30/2022, for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Concealed Carrier, LLC. (Shofner, Robin) Modified on 9/22/2022 (York, M). |
Filing 20
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/13/2022: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 2:22-CV-1432 DB.(Reader, L)
|
| Filing 19 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Concealed Carrier, LLC served on 9/1/2022, answer due 9/22/2022. (Wolf, Adam) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER issued by Law Clerk for Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/12/2022: The parties' re #16 Stipulation is granted. The September 23, 2022 hearing of plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order #11 and request to seal #10 is continued to October 7, 2022. (Text Only Entry)(Van Dine, B) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Shofner, Robin) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Continuance of RTS and TRO Hearings by Concealed Carrier, LLC. Attorney Shofner, Robin D. added. (Shofner, Robin) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company re #14 Order. (Wolf, Adam) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/30/2022 ORDERING #10 Request to Seal Document, pursuant to L.R. 141, and #11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, SET for 9/23/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Within 7 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file proof of service of this order on the defendant. Statement of Opposition or Non-Opposition to plaintiff's motions due by 9/9/2022. Defendant shall file a completed consent or decline to consent to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge form, and Plaintiff may file a reply by 9/16/2022.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/30/2022 GRANTING #3 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Stephen M. Kepper, to appear for Edge-Works Manufacturing Company. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/30/2022 GRANTING #2 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Gregory D. Latham, to appear for Edge-Works Manufacturing Company. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Redacted Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Redacted Declaration of Scott Evans, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Redacted Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Declaration of Stephen Kepper, #12 Exhibit A, #13 Exhibit B, #14 Exhibit C, #15 Exhibit D, #16 Exhibit E, #17 Exhibit F, #18 Proposed Order, #19 Temporary Restraining Order Checklist, #20 Proof of Service)(Wolf, Adam) Modified on 8/25/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Request to Seal Documents, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proof of Service)(Wolf, Adam) Modified on 8/31/2022 (Reader, L). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/22/2022 DENYING #8 Request to Seal without prejudice to renewal. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company. (Wolf, Adam) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Wolf, Adam) |
| Filing 6 PATENT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Patent #1:* US 10,306,973 B2 * * 06/04/19 * * Edge-Works Manufacturing Company * Patent #2:* US 10,492,595 B2 * * 12/03/19 * * Edge-Works Manufacturing Company * ; copy of Complaint and Patent Report emailed to U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Patent Report, #3 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Concealed Carrier, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Adam B. Wolf* *Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane & Conway* *5042 Wilshire Blvd., No. 304* *Los Angeles, CA 90036*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 3 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company for attorney Stephen M. Kepper to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10378662) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing)(Wolf, Adam) |
| Filing 2 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company, for attorney Gregory D. Latham to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10378642) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing)(Wolf, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant by Edge-Works Manufacturing Company,. Attorney Wolf, Adam B. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10378590) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolf, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
