Cyrus Zal, A Professional Corporation v. Elavon, Inc. et al
| Cyrus Zal, A Professional Corporation |
| Elavon, Inc., North America Credit & Risk and Jeremy Naleway |
| 2:2022cv01439 |
| August 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2022. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from District Judge *Troy L. Nunley* to * District Judge Dale A. Drozd* for all further proceedings. (Perdue, C.)
|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Elavon, Inc., Jeremy Naleway, North America Credit & Risk* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Cyrus Zal* *Law Office of Victor S. Haltom* *1001 G Street, Suite 100* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Cyrus Zal, A Professional Corporation. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10380293) (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Zal, Cyrus added. (Zal, Cyrus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
