(PC) Rojas v. CDCR, et al
| Robert Eugene Rojas |
| California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, County of Sacramento, Deanna Patterson and Asutra |
| 2:2022cv01547 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/5/2022. Old Case Number 1:22-cv-01106-EPG (PC). New Case Number 2:22-cv-01547-DB (PC). (Rivera, O)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Robert Eugene Rojas. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Robert Eugene Rojas. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Asutra, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, County of Sacramento, Deanna Patterson by Robert Eugene Rojas. (Rivera, O)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
