(PC) Jones v. Madden et al
Plaintiff: Rayon Jones
Defendant: Raymond Madden and C. Green
Case Number: 2:2022cv01592
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edmund F Brennan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Rayon Jones. (Woodworth, M.)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for Rayon Jones, CDCR No. G-35669, to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Huang, H)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rayon Jones. (Spichka, K.)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/12/2022 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit an IFP or the appropriate filing fee of $402 within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and IFP form served on Rayon Jones. (Spichka, K.)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of CLERICAL ERROR re Defendant Name by Rayon Jones. (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 9/26/2022 (Huang, H).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Spichka, K.)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Rayon Jones. (Spichka, K.)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Rayon Jones. (Spichka, K.)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Rayon Jones. (Spichka, K.)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against C. Green and Raymond Madden by Rayon Jones.(Spichka, K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Jones v. Madden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rayon Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?