(PC) Matthews v. Ramos et al
| Gene Raymond Matthews III and Gene Raymond Matthews, III |
| S. Ramos, G King and O. Ujeda |
| 2:2022cv01633 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Gene Raymond Matthews, III. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-1633 WBS DMC. (Spichka, K.) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Gene Raymond Matthews III. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K) |
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Trust Account of Gene Raymond Matthews, III signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/29/2022. Plaintiff's motion to proceed ifp is granted by separate order. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with this order. The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/29/2022 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request to proceed in forma pauperis. (Yin, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, #6 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Gene Raymond Matthews III. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Gene Raymond Matthews III (Her, S) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Gene Raymond Matthews III, CDC BP-7876 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Her, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Gene Raymond Matthews III. (Her, S) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Gene Raymond Matthews III. (Her, S) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against G King, S. Ramos, O. Ujeda by Gene Raymond Matthews III.(Her, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
