(PC) Abiel v. Jones et al
| Aban Abiel |
| R. Jones, J. Tomatis, C. Snyder and J. Heckman |
| 2:2022cv01657 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against J. Heckman, R. Jones, C. Snyder, J. Tomatis by Aban Abiel.(Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/26/22 DIRECTING the Plaintiff to submit an IFP Application or the $402 filing fee within 30 days of this order. (Her, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP Form served on Aban Abiel. (Her, S) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *9/21/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 10/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Her, S) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Aban Abiel. (Her, S) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Aban Abiel (Her, S) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against J. Heckman, R. Jones, C. Snyder, J. Tomatis by Aban Abiel.(Her, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
