USA v. Approx. $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Case Number: 2:2022cv01731
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by United States of America. (Khasigian, Kevin)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by United States of America. (Khasigian, Kevin)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by United States of America re #1 Complaint, #6 Warrant Issued - O, #4 Order, #5 Order, #3 Civil New Case Documents for DAD. (Khasigian, Kevin)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SERVICE BY PUBLICATION filed by United States of America. Last publication date 11/05/2022. (Khasigian, Kevin)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Arrest of defendant currency and Warrant for Arrest by United States of America. (Khasigian, Kevin) Modified on 11/1/2022 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WARRANT for ARREST of ARTICLES in REM issued. (Coll, A)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/11/2022 DIRECTING the Clerk to issue a Warrant for Arrest of Articles In Rem for the defendant currency. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Coll, A)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/06/2022. (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 10/7/2022 (Rodriguez, E).
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/21/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 [DISREGARD - ISSED IN ERROR] SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kevin Christopher Khasigian, GOVT* *United States Attorney's Office* *501 I Street Suite 10-100* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Licea Chavez, V) Modified on 10/6/2022 (Benson, A.).
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency by United States. Attorney Khasigian, Kevin Christopher added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Order for Publication)(Khasigian, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Approx. $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Kevin Christopher Khasigian, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?