Smith v. Roseburg Forest Products Co.
| Tim Smith |
| Roseburg Forest Products Co. |
| 2:2022cv01763 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/28/2022: Pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. #8 ) and FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Tim Smith. (Reiner, Russell) |
Filing 7
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/31/2022 REASSIGNING CASE 2:22-cv-1767 to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota and VACATING any dates currently set in that case. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Weatherford, Victoria) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED #4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Roseburg Forest Products Co. (Weatherford, Victoria) Modified on 10/17/2022 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Roseburg Forest Products Co. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for TLN. (Weatherford, Victoria) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:22-cv-01767-DMC, 4:22-cv-05778-DMR, 3:22-cv-05780-LB by Roseburg Forest Products Co.. (Weatherford, Victoria) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Siskiyou County Superior Court, case number CV PO 22-951 by Roseburg Forest Products Co. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10479258) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Declaration of Victoria L. Weatherford, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit 1, #7 Exhibit 2, #8 Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding, #9 Exhibit A, #10 Exhibit B, #11 Exhibit C)(Weatherford, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Roseburg Forest Products Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tim Smith | |
| Represented By: | Russell Reiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roseburg Forest Products Co. | |
| Represented By: | Victoria Weatherford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
