(HC) McCoy v. Sacramento County Jail
Petitioner: Jerome McCoy and Jerome Eli McCoy
Respondent: Sacramento County Jail
Case Number: 2:2022cv01770
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/2022 ORDERING the Clerk to send petitioner a civil rights complaint form. Within 30 days, petitioner shall complete and file the civil rights complaint in this court. Filing of the complaint shall signify that petitioner wishes to convert this matter to a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Petitioner's failure to file the completed civil rights complaint form within the time allotted will result in a recommendation that the instant habeas petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Yin, K)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/16/22 DENYING #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. (Woodworth, M.)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Jerome Eli McCoy. (Woodworth, M.)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and 1983 form served on Jerome Eli McCoy. (Yin, K)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jerome Eli McCoy. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 11/14/2022 (Yin, K).
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Woodworth, M.)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 11/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Her, S)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jerome McCoy. (Her, S)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jerome McCoy. (Her, S)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sacramento County Jail by Jerome McCoy.(Her, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) McCoy v. Sacramento County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerome McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerome Eli McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sacramento County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?