Gilbert v. Abusaud et al
Darren Gilbert |
Ahmed Said Abusaud and Baljinder Singh Doing business as Discount Liquor & Cigarettes |
2:2022cv01783 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Morrison C England |
Kendall J Newman |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Ahmed Said Abusaud on 11/10/2022, Answer due 1/9/2023 (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Baljinder Singh. Attorney Reeves, Rex added. (Reeves, Rex) Modified on 11/14/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Baljinder Singh served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Ahmed Said Abusaud, Baljinder Singh* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *300 South First St. Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Darren Gilbert. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10485315) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.