(PC)Birrell v. DiTomas
Plaintiff: David Wesley Birrell and Bella-Christina Birrell
Defendant: Michelle DiTomas
Case Number: 2:2022cv01834
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/14/2022 ORDERING that, within 30 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Huang, H)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and IFP Application served on David Wesley Birrell. (Huang, H)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-1834-KJM-DMC (PC). (Zignago, K.)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on David Wesley Birrell. (Zignago, K.)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Zignago, K.)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/17/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Reader, L)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Michelle DiTomas by David Wesley Birrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on David Wesley Birrell. (Reader, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC)Birrell v. DiTomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Wesley Birrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bella-Christina Birrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle DiTomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?