(PC) Dalke v. Sacramento Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Dalke
Defendant: Sacramento Corrections, Hyman and Mosley
Case Number: 2:2022cv01842
Filed: October 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: Dale A Drozd
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/18/2022 DENYING #10 Motion for Extension of Time as unnecessary and GRANTING plaintiff until 14 days after being served with this order to file Objections to her Findings and Recommendations.(Coll, A)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order served on Joshua Dalke. (Coll, A)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for 90-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to pay filing fee re #9 Order by Joshua Dalke. (Kaminski, H)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/27/22 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court shall randomlyassign a United States District Judge to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintif'f's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 be denied. Plaintiff be given 30 days to pay the filing fee or face dismissal of the case. Assigned and referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-1842 DAD AC (PC). (Plummer, M)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Joshua Dalke. (Plummer, M)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Woodworth, M.)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Joshua Dalke. (Woodworth, M.)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for Joshua Dalke, CDCR No. AE-0507, to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in.pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Huang, H)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/18/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Coll, A)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 [DISREGARD - See #4 Amended New Case Documents] PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/18/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Licea Chavez, V) Modified on 10/19/2022 (Coll, A).
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Amended Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Joshua Dalke. (Coll, A)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Joshua Dalke. (Licea Chavez, V)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Joshua Dalke. (Licea Chavez, V)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Hyman, Mosley, Sacramento Corrections by Joshua Dalke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Licea Chavez, V)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Dalke v. Sacramento Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Dalke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?