(HC) Barton v. California Mens Colony
| William Barton |
| California Mens Colony |
| 2:2022cv01899 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by William Barton (Benson, A.)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for William Barton, CDCR No. B-71646 to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in.pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William Barton. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/1/2022 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days, a request to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed. The Clerk shall send petitioner an ifp form. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and ifp form served on William Barton. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 2
[DISREGARD - See #3 New Case Documents] PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/1/2022. (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 10/25/2022 (Huang, H).
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William Barton. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against California Mens Colony by William Barton. (Rodriguez, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Barton v. California Mens Colony | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Barton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: California Mens Colony | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
