(PC) Bullard v. Sacramento Police Department
| Rondell Donta Bullard |
| Sacramento Police Department |
| 2:2022cv01914 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not deliverable as Addressed: #6 Order and #5 Order Dismissing Case sent to Rondell Donta Bullard. Notice of Change of Address due by 2/20/2023. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Inmate Trust Account of Rondell Donta Bullard signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/2022. The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's ifp on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/30/2022 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request for leave to proceed ifp and DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall complete and return the Notice of Amendment with the required documents. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 , #6 Orders served on Rondell Donta Bullard. Copy of #6 Order and ifp served on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Perdue, C.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Rondell Donta Bullard. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rondell Donta Bullard. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Sacramento Police Department by Rondell Donta Bullard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perdue, C.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Bullard v. Sacramento Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rondell Donta Bullard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sacramento Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
