(PC) Cannedy v. Amador County Sheriff Department et al
| Steven Cannedy |
| Amador County Sheriff Department and Jeremy Martain |
| 2:2022cv02001 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Inmate Trust Account of Steven Cannedy signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/28/2022. The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's ifp on the Sheriff of Amador County. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/28/2022 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 , #7 requests for leave to proceed ifp. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, see 28U.S.C. 1915A, and will not be served. Within 30 days, plaintiff may file an amended complaint in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a prisoner complaint form. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 , #11 Orders and 1983 form served on Steven Cannedy. Copy of #11 Order and ifp served on the Sheriff of Amador County. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 9
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Steven Cannedy (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/29/22 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a certified trust statement within 30 days. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on Steven Cannedy. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Steven Cannedy. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 5
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-02001 TLN AC. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Steven Cannedy. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/8/22 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a certified trust statement within 30 days. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Steven Cannedy. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Steven Cannedy. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Steven Cannedy. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Steven Cannedy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woodworth, M.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
