(PS) Bordin v. Rau et al
Richard Gene Bordin |
Jon Rau and Josh Rau |
2:2022cv02046 |
November 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Troy L Nunley |
Agriculture Acts |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Coll, A) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Jon Rau, Josh Rau* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Richard Gene Bordin* *1200 Springfield Dr* *Chico, CA 95928*. (Coll, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Civil New Case Documents for TLN, #3 Summons served on Richard Gene Bordin. (Coll, A) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200124417 $402.00 fbo Richard Gene Bordin by Richard Gene Bordin on 12/8/2022. (Coll, A) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Richard Gene Bordin. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Richard Gene Bordin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.