Boot Barn, Inc. et al v. Bonta
Boot Barn, Inc. and Dan Post Boot Company |
Rob Bonta |
2:2022cv02105 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Kimberly J Mueller |
William B Shubb |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CIVIL CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/29/2023 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (Reader, L) |
Filing 14 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/10/2023. RELATING CASES 2:19-CV-2471 KJM CKD, 2:19-CV-2488 KJM CKD, 2:21-CV-1652 KJM CKD and 2:22-CV-2105 WBS DB. REASSIGNING CASE 2:22-CV-2105 to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney for all further proceedings. VACATING all previous scheduling conference dates. Senior Judge William B. Shubb, Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes no longer assigned to case. New Case Number: 2:22-CV-2105 KJM CKD.(Reader, L) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:19-cv-02471-KJM-CKD, 2:19-cv-02488-KJM-CKD, 2:21-cv-01652-KJM-CKD by Rob Bonta. (Collins, Natalie) |
Filing 12 ANSWER by Rob Bonta. Attorney Collins, Natalie added.(Collins, Natalie) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Rob Bonta served on 11/29/2022. (Hughes, Christopher) Modified on 12/2/2022 (Rodriguez, E). |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/28/2022 GRANTING #5 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney David E. Frulla, PHV for Boot Barn, Inc., David E. Frulla, PHV for Dan Post Boot Company. (Perdue, C.) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/28/2022 GRANTING #4 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Bret Sparks, PHV for Boot Barn, Inc. and Dan Post Boot Company. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Perdue, C.) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Rob Bonta* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Christopher D. Hughes* *Nossaman LLP* *621 Capitol Mall, Ste. 2500* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 7 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/27/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 6 [DISREGARD SEE DOC 8] SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Rob Bonta* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Christopher D. Hughes* *Nossaman LLP* *621 Capitol Mall, Ste. 2500* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Boot Barn, Inc., Dan Post Boot Company for attorney David Frulla to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10563024) (Hughes, Christopher) |
Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Boot Barn, Inc., Dan Post Boot Company for attorney Bret A. Sparks to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10563004) (Hughes, Christopher) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Dan Post Boot Company. (Hughes, Christopher) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Boot Barn, Inc.. (Hughes, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10562917)(Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hughes, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.