Luxelocker LLC v. Luxe Boat & RV Storage, et al.,
Luxelocker, LLC |
Luxe Boat & RV Storage, Tig Tech, Inc., Chad Abel and Cori Abel |
2:2022cv02106 |
November 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to All Defendants (Camuti, Nathan) |
Filing 4 TRADEMARK NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Trademark #1:* 5985675 * * 02/11/2020 * * Luxelocker, LLC * ; copy of Complaint and Trademark Report emailed to U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/4/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 Trademark Report, #4 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Chad Abel, Cori Abel, Luxe Boat & RV Storage, Tig Tech, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nathan Camuti* *Camuti Law Group APC* *33 Brookline* *Aliso Viejo, CA 92656*. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Luxelocker LLC (Camuti, Nathan) . |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Luxelocker LLC. Attorney Camuti, Nathan added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10563042) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Camuti, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.