(PC) Whitsitt v. Spencer et al
Plaintiff: William J. Whitsitt
Defendant: Tim Spencer and San Joaquin County Jail
Case Number: 2:2022cv02114
Filed: November 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William J. Whitsitt. (Spichka, K.)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/05/23 GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order in which to comply #4 Order.(Licea Chavez, V)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on William J. Whitsitt. (Licea Chavez, V)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order SECOND RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order w/ IFP Application re-served on William J. Whitsitt at San Joaquin County Jail. (Woodworth, M.)
December 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to File IFP and Request for IFP Form by William J. Whitsitt. (Woodworth, M.)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order w/ ifp application re-served on William J. Whitsitt at San Joaquin County Jail (pursuant to facility, plaintiff is still in custody). (Yin, K)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/1/2022 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the $402 filing fee. Plaintiff's #2 Request to be served at 2 different addresses is DENIED. (Perdue, C.)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and new application for IFP served on William J. Whitsitt. (Perdue, C.)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 1/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Woodworth, M.)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William J. Whitsitt. (Woodworth, M.)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William J. Whitsitt. (Woodworth, M.)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by William J. Whitsitt. (Woodworth, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Whitsitt v. Spencer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William J. Whitsitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Joaquin County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?