(PC) Belyew v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
| Lisa Marie Belyew |
| California Correctional Health Care Services, Grout and Dhillon |
| 2:2022cv02115 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CASE CLOSED (text only entry): Pursuant to #4 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal under FRCP 41(a) this case is CLOSED. (Huang, H) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice re Voluntary Dismissal served on Lisa Marie Belyew. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Lisa Marie Belyew. (Kaminski, H) Modified on 12/20/2022 (Huang, H). |
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/29/22 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a $402 filing fee or an Application for IFP within 30 days. (Woodworth, M.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order & IFP Packet served on Lisa Marie Belyew. (Woodworth, M.) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Lisa Marie Belyew.(Kastilahn, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Lisa Marie Belyew. (Kastilahn, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
