National Interstate Ins. Co. v. Acceptance Casualty Ins. Co.
| National Interstate Insurance Company |
| Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company |
| 2:2022cv02127 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/24/2023 EXTENDING #7 to 2/3/2023, that Defendant's last day to respond to the Complaint. Consent/Decline designation regarding magistrate judge jurisdiction shall do so by 2/1/2023.(Reader, L)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for ACIC to Respond to #1 Complaint, by National Interstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rasmussen, Nicholas) Modified on 1/20/2023 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rasmussen, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company served on 12/9/2022. (Rasmussen, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nicholas H. Rasmussen* *McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte & Carruth, LLP* *7647 N. Fresno Street* *Fresno, California 93720*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by National Interstate Insurance Company. (Rasmussen, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company by National Interstate Insurance Company. Attorney Rasmussen, Nicholas Hans added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10571118) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rasmussen, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: National Interstate Ins. Co. v. Acceptance Casualty Ins. Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: National Interstate Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Hans Rasmussen |
| Represented By: | Daniella Marie Crisanti |
| Represented By: | Graham Arthur Van Leuven |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
