(PC) Watts v. Covello et al
| Vernell Watts |
| Patrick Covello, Bryan Holmes, Jason Vega, Joseph Pierce, Arley Garibay and A. Tsushko |
| 2:2022cv02311 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on Director of CDCR. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Vernell Watts signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/6/2023. CDCR is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the Clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/6/2023 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall pay the statutory filing fee of $350. #1 Complaint alleges, for screening purposes, potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Pierce, Garibay and Tsushko. All other claims (including those against defendants Covello, Holmes, and Vega) are DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days of service of this order. Plaintiff is not obligated to amend his complaint. Within 30 days plaintiff shall return the notice advising the court whether he elects to proceed with the cognizable claims or file an amended complaint. Failure to comply with any part of this this order may result in dismissal of this action. (Huang, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, and #8 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Vernell Watts. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Vernell Watts. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for Vernell Watts, CDCR No. T-19813, to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *12/29/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 2/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Vernell Watts. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Vernell Watts. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Patrick Covello, Arley Garibay, Bryan Holmes, Joseph Pierce, A. Tsushko, Jason Vega by Vernell Watts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rodriguez, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
