(PC) Ricalls v. Smith
Plaintiff: James Leonard Ricalls
Defendant: R. Smith
Case Number: 2:2022cv02322
Filed: December 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/22/2023 DENYING #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Spichka, K.)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order served on James Leonard Ricalls. (Spichka, K.)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by James Leonard Ricalls. (Spichka, K.)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for APPOINTMENT of COUNSEL by James Leonard Ricalls. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on James Leonard Ricalls. (Yin, K)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/25/2023 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's #2 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K) (Main Document replaced on 1/26/2023 with corrected image.) Modified on 1/26/2023 (Yin, K).
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/25/2023 DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order. (Yin, K)
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend served on James Leonard Ricalls. (Yin, K) Modified on 1/26/2023 (Yin, K).
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Licea Chavez, V)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Spichka, K.)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on James Leonard Ricalls. (Spichka, K.)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE2001124756 $402.00 by James Ricalls on 12/30/2022. (Coll, A)
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by James Leonard Ricalls. (Spichka, K.)
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against R. Smith by James Leonard Ricalls. (Spichka, K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Ricalls v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Leonard Ricalls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?