Perez v. Lammersville Unified School District
Gilbert Perez and Tara Perez |
Lammersville Unified School District |
2:2022mc00257 |
August 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/2022: The court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney Fees and Expenses, ECF No. #1 . The Petition/Motion, as filed, is defective. Plaintiffs are directed to comply with Local Rules 230(a) and notice the Petition/Motion for an available law and motion date before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Minute Order on Defendant not yet appearing. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED.(Zignago, K.) |
PAYMENT for Civil Case filing fee in the amount of $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10389874. (Amey, Nicole) |
PAYMENT for miscellaneous case filing fee in the amount of $ 49, receipt number ACAEDC-10389871. (Amey, Nicole) |
Filing 1 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES as Prevailing Party by Gilbert Perez, Tara Perez. Attorney Amey, Nicole Hodge added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Amey, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.