Todd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
| Joshua Todd |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2023at01066 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by United Parcel Service, Inc. re #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Declaration, #3 Declaration, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #1 Notice of Removal. (Brown, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Brown, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by United Parcel Service, Inc. (Brown, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Robert Anderson re #1 Notice of Removal. (Brown, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Ryan C. Swift re #1 Notice of Removal. (Brown, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Elizabeth A. Brown re #1 Notice of Removal. (Brown, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UOE-2023-9034 by Joshua Todd. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-11143102) (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Notice of Interested Parties)(Brown, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
