(PS) Zito v. Collins et al
| Thomas J. Zito |
| Sean K. Collins and William A. Gottlieb |
| 2:2023cv00004 |
| January 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from District of Massachusetts case number 1:23-cv-10047. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/4/2023 CASE TRANSFERRED to United States District Court of Massachusettes.(Perdue, C.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Thomas J. Zito. (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sean K. Collins, William A. Gottlieb* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas J. Zito* *7065 Warbler Way* *Sacramento, California 95831*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sean K. Collins, William A. Gottlieb by Thomas J. Zito. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L) |
| RECEIPT number CAE200124758 for $402.00 for Civil Filing Fee from Thomas Zito. (Reader, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: [HAND DELIVERED] #3 Civil New Case Documents for KJM, #2 Summons served on Thomas J. Zito. (Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
