(PC) Carroll et al v. Newsom et al
| Tremayne Carroll and Latasha Brown |
| Newsom, CDCR and Pat Vasquez |
| 2:2023cv00241 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 [DISREGARD- Case Transferred] CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/14/2023 TRANSFERRING CASE to Fresno Division. New Case Number 1:23-cv-0224 HBK (PC). Old Case Number 2:23-cv-0241 DMC (PC). (Spichka, K.)
|
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 3/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Spichka, K.) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Latasha Brown and Tremayne Carroll. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Latasha Brown and Tremayne Carroll. (Spichka, K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
