USAA General Indemnity Co. v. Electrolux North America, Inc.
| USAA General Indemnity Company |
| Electrolux North America, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00276 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/17/2023: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 2:23-cv-00276-CKD.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/16/2023 DIRECTING that within 30 days of this order, the parties shall discuss, in person or by telephone, their obligations to transmit mandatory disclosures to the other parties. Within 14 days thereafter, the parties shall file a joint status report with the court for the entry of a pretrial scheduling order. (Perdue, C.)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral . (Bauerle, Ashley) Modified on 3/17/2023 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Electrolux North America, Inc. (Biernat, Rebecca) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Civil New Case Documents for Magistrate as Presider served on Ashley Bauerle NCAED. (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UPI-2022-10481 by Electrolux North America, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCAEDC-10693499) (Attachments: #1 Declaration and Exhibits)(Biernat, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USAA General Indemnity Co. v. Electrolux North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USAA General Indemnity Company | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Bauerle, NCAED |
| Represented By: | Ashley Elizabeth Bauerle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Electrolux North America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Marie Biernat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
