Blohm v. Ford Motor Co.
| Jon F. Blohm |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2023cv00332 |
| February 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/13/2023 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal of case with Prejudice (JOINT) by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nusser, Linda) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 05/08/2023 CONTINUING the Deadline for filing Dispositional Documents by 45 days to 06/29/2023. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Dispositional Documents by Ford Motor Company. (Nusser, Linda) |
| Filing 11 [DISREGARD - see #12 Stipulation and Proposed Order] STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Dispositional Documents by Ford Motor Company. (Nusser, Linda) Modified on 5/8/2023 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 10 [DISREGARD - see #12 Stipulation and Proposed Order] STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Dispositional Documents by Ford Motor Company. (Nusser, Linda) Modified on 5/3/2023 (Kastilahn, A). Modified on 5/8/2023 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy G. Michel for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 4/17/2023: The Court has been advised by counsel that this action has SETTLED. See ECF No. #8 . Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to file dispositional documents within twenty-one (21) days in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 160. Any hearing dates and deadlines previously set in this matter are VACATED. [TEXT ENTRY ONLY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Ford Motor Company. (Nusser, Linda) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta to the bench of the Eastern District of California, this action is reassigned from *District Judge Troy L. Nunley* to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta for all further proceedings. All pending motions are submitted without appearance and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and the hearing on said motions is VACATED. If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. Further, all pretrial conference and trial dates currently set in this reassigned action are VACATED and shall be reset, as necessary, by the reassigned Court. (Benson, A.)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Zazzi, Kimberli) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nusser, Linda) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Hugret, Spencer Peter added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Linda Lourimore Nusser on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Nusser, Linda) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2023-00333152 by Ford Motor Company. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10714497) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Linda Nusser, #2 Exhibit A , #3 Exhibit B , #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D , #6 Exhibit E , #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H , #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Interested Parties, #14 Certificate of Service)(Nusser, Linda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blohm v. Ford Motor Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jon F. Blohm | |
| Represented By: | Kimberli Charleen Zazzi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Linda Lourimore Nusser |
| Represented By: | Spencer Peter Hugret |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
