(PC) Hamilton v. CDCR
Plaintiff: Albert John Hamilton
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Case Number: 2:2023cv00347
Filed: February 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Calabretta
Referring Judge: John A Mendez
2 Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/20/2023 DENYING the #15 Request for Reconsideration and DIRECTING Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #18 Order served on Albert John Hamilton. (Spichka, K.)
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta to the bench of the Eastern District of California, this action is reassigned from *District Judge Dale A. Drozd* to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta for all further proceedings. All pending motions are submitted without appearance and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and the hearing on said motions is VACATED. If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. Further, all pretrial conference and trial dates currently set in this reassigned action are VACATED and shall be reset, as necessary, by the reassigned Court. (Donati, J)
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #17 Order Reassigning Newly Appointed District Judge served on Albert John Hamilton. (Donati, J)
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REPLY to #15 Objections by California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation. (Alcheck, Shaina) Modified on 4/4/2023 (Huang, H).
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:23-cv-0347 DAD KJN (PC). (Spichka, K.)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 14 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Albert John Hamilton. (Spichka, K.)
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REQUEST for RECONSIDERATION by Plaintiff Albert John Hamilton. (Spichka, K.) Modified on 4/21/2023 (Spichka, K.).
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Spichka, K.)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/14/2023 DISMISSING the Complaint and DIRECTING Plaintiff to complete and submit the Notice of Amendment and an Amended Complaint within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order served on Albert John Hamilton. (Spichka, K.)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Martin-Gill, S)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE: Please disregard #8 Civil New Case Documents for JAM - wrong new case documents issued. (Martin-Gill, S)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE: New case number is 2:23-cv-00347 KJN (PC). Previously assigned incorrectly. (Martin-Gill, S)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction, #11 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, 10 Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction served on Albert John Hamilton. (Martin-Gill, S)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order, #3 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:23-cv-01017.
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR SCREENING AND TRANSFER (Dkt. No. #3 ); AND (2) TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SACRAMENTO DIVISION) by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. Case transferred electronically. (Case Terminated-MD JS-6). (et) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against DefendantsCalifornia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant to 42:1983., filed by Plaintiff Albert John Hamilton.[FILED IN STATE COURT 06/22/2020 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Certificate of Compliance with Requirements to Give Notice of Removal filed by defendant California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Certificate of Compliance)(Alcheck, Shaina) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST for Order for Screening and Transfer filed by DEFENDANT California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Defendant's Request for Sceening Order and Transfer) (Alcheck, Shaina) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation. (Alcheck, Shaina) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV23784 Receipt No: ACACDC-34777775 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Shaina Liat Alcheck added to party California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation(pty:dft))(Alcheck, Shaina) [Transferred from cacd on 2/27/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Hamilton v. CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert John Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Represented By: Shaina Liat Alcheck
Represented By: Preeti Kaur Bajwa
Represented By: Robert A Bonta
Represented By: Shaina Alcheck
Represented By: Robert A. Bonta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?