Johl et al v. CDCR et al
| Harpreet Johl, Tina and Sebastian Dzekashu |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Services, Deborah Bradford, Marcie Flores, Barbara Barney-Knox, Joseph Bick, Jasinda Muhammad, Migdalia Siaca, Mary Ann Monahan and Rainbow Brockenborough |
| 2:2023cv00457 |
| March 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Barbara Barney-Knox, Joseph Bick, Deborah Bradford, Rainbow Brockenborough, California Correctional Health Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Marcie Flores, Mary Ann Monahan, Jasinda Muhammad, Migdalia Siaca* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nicholas R. Webb, RN, DNP* *Law Office of Nicholas R. Webb* *1426 Plaza de Oro* *Benicia, California 94510*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Sebastian Dzekashu, Harpreet Johl. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10742908) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Webb, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
