Singh et al v. Garland et al
| Alovepreet Singh and Harbhajan Singh |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Lisa Kehl and Mari-Carmen Jordan |
| 2:2023cv00483 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mari-Carmen Jordan, Lisa Kehl, and Alejandro Mayorkas (Wong, Elliot) Modified on 4/10/2023 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mari-Carmen Jordan, Lisa Kehl, Alejandro Mayorkas* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Sajjad Hussain* *Indus Pacific Law Office* *8996 Miramar Rd., Suite 306* *San Diego, California 92126*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Alovepreet Singh. Attorney Hussain, Sajjad added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10746842) (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hussain, Sajjad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
