Blankership v. City of Sacramento
| Adam Blankership and Adam Blankenship |
| City of Sacramento |
| 2:2023cv00610 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/15/2023: In light of Plaintiff's counsel's calendar conflict, the parties' Stipulated Request to Continue, ECF No. #11 , is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 8/10/2023 is RESET for 9/21/2023 at 2:30 PM before Chief Judge Kimberly J. Muller, with the filing of a Joint Status Report due fourteen (14) days prior. (The parties' requested date of 9/12/2023 is unavailable.) (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Initial Scheduling conference by Adam Blankenship. (Velez, Mark) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER with Jury Demand by City of Sacramento.(Gibson, David) |
Filing 9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/23/23 EXTENDING the deadline for defendant City of Sacramento to file a response to plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is extended to 06/09/23. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading by City of Sacramento. Attorney Gibson, David added. (Gibson, David) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Velez, Mark) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Sacramento* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mark P. Velez* *The Velez Law Firm* *3010 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 120* *Roseville, CA 95661*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Adam Blankership.(Velez, Mark) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2023 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Sacramento* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mark P. Velez* *The Velez Law Firm* *3010 Lava Ridge Court Suite 120* *Roseville, CA 95661*. (Perdue, C.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Adam Blankership (Velez, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Sacramento by Adam Blankership. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10778281) (Velez, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
